Rich v. Bingham


01/21/10 – 02/10/10

Play button overlay
Play button overlay


The plaintiff-mail carrier's mesothelioma allegedly resulted not from vocational exposure, but from exposure to joint compounds in home improvement products that he allegedly purchased from hardware stores in the 1960's and 1970's to repair a recurring crack in the walls of his home.

According to the plaintiff, sanding the joint compound created fine asbestos dust that got into the plaintiff's lungs, and the defense expert witness could only find a different type of asbestos was involved by violating his own methodology.

Defendants, which include R.T. Vanderbilt, Kaiser Gypsum, and Union Carbide, alleged that the plaintiff's exposure to these products was not sufficient to cause his current cancer, and that some products were not sold at the stores where the plaintiff claims to have bought them. In addition, the types of asbestos found in the plaintiff's lung tissue allegedly did not closely match the fiber types used in the products the plaintiff allegedly used.

The jury returned a defense verdict, finding neither negligence nor the the delivery of a defective product by any of the defendants that was the legal cause of Fred Rich's illness.

View a free video clip from the case:
Defense attorney, Susan Cole, delivers opening statement -- Clip 1


Found for the defense


AM Session
Not in Session
0 Chapters
PM Session
Not in Session
0 Chapters

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 4901 Olde Towne Parkway
  • Suite 100
  • Marietta, GA 30068
  • 877-838-9067
  • 404-935-0321

Copyright 2022 Courtroom Connect.