Purnell-Charleston v. State Farm


Oral Argument
02/05/13 – 02/05/13


In this oral argument before the Delaware Supreme Court, the attorney representing plaintiff Dianna Purnell-Charleston sought reversal of the Superior Court's decision that concluded State Farm had satisfied its statutory obligation of extending a meaningful offer of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage equal to Ms. Purnell-Charleston's bodily injury liability limits. Ms. Purnell-Charleston filed a suit after State Farm denied her request for reformation of her automobile insurance policy, increasing her UM/UIM limits to match that of her liability coverage, $25,000/$50,000.


The Superior Court's judgment was affirmed.


Suggest a Trial

Want to see a trial that you don't see in our list of upcoming trials?

Suggest a Case

CVN Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

CVN Essentials

Video Library

Unlimited access to thousands of hours of past coverage of high stakes civil litigation

Video Library

  • Follow Us
  • Contact Us
  • 4901 Olde Towne Parkway
  • Suite 100
  • Marietta, GA 30068
  • 877-834-8627
  • 404-935-0321

Copyright 2024 Courtroom Connect.